Jalen Brunson: The One That Got Away

I'll be honest and say that when the Mavs traded Doncic for Davis, yes, I was a bit surprised, but I wasn't one of those kinds of people who couldn't see the logic in the decision.  There were financial factors involved, i.e. do you want to supermax a player who you know isn't likely to lead you to a championship?  And you know, it's sorta like damned if you do, damned if you don't.  Luka was the face of the franchise, and you don't want to alienate your fanbase.  But at the same time, with a superstar like that, if you don't win a championship eventually, those same fans will diss you.

In hindsight, I would say the biggest mistake Dallas made wasn't trading Doncic in and of itself but rather trading one perennially-injured allstar for another, even older perennially-injured allstar.  Also, having Anthony around never panned out as idealized because, excuse my expression, he plays like a bum.

It was blaringly obvious that the Mavs needed an interior presence more than anything.  Remember, we're now in the Wemby Era.  But there goes Anthony, executing crossovers and jacking up three-pointers, as if he isn't 7-feet tall and shit.

But now, let's go back even further to the 2022 Playoffs.  And if you dig back through this blog, this is something I pointed out at that time.

During that postseason, the Mavs were playing better with Brunson and without Luka than they were playing with Luka and without Brunson or with both of them in the lineup.  These kinds of things, they aren't easy to explain logically because of course, Doncic was putting up better stats, perhaps more than anyone else in the entire playoffs.  But he was also of course regularly injured.  Yet the Mavs, depsite being underdogs without him, led by Jalen were pulling off upsets.  And once Luka did return like fulltime, that chemistry or magic was destroyed.

Again, this isn't something I can fully explain, how the team seemed to play better without Doncic, considering that Brunson is an even bigger chuck.  But I would say that maybe, the other Mavs players were able to fukwit him more because, not trying to sound racist or anything, but he plays more of a Black brand of basketball.

Also, back then Luka appeared sorta despondent towards his teammates.  Thankfully, that problem appears to have been solved, as he seems to be a lot more connected and supportive on the Lakers.

Now we can say that, no matter how much money Dallas offered, Brunson was going to bounce anyway, to be with his dad in NY.  If the Mavs' braintrust had inside knowledge of something like that, that they didn't even have a chance, then that would explain why they didn't really try to keep him.

Indeed, the general thinking at the time was, who would pay a king's ransom for Jalen and in the process risk losing Luka?  In other words, no one was even imagining that Brunson may be the better player.  Well, that is to say no one but me.

IS BRUNSON BETTER THAN DONCIC?

So recently I was watching this video about 'who turned out to be best player in each NBA draft', and when the presenter got around to 2018, I was sure he was going to crown Luka.  Remember that both Ayton and Bagley were selected before Doncic, and even the Hawks had a chance to land him but rather opted for Trae Young.  Those decisions have gone down as some of the biggest mishaps in recent draft history.

But who the presenter actually chose - who I had totally forgotten about - is SGA.  And I mean, he's right, now looking back from the future.

I'd still contend that Doncic is the most naturally-talented player in the NBA.  But all of the things people were predicting or hoping for Luka - MVPs and championships and shit like that - it's rather been Shai who's taken them home.  Yet and still, I wouldn't go as far as to say that SGA is the better individual player(?).

And that, dear reader, is the dilemma or confusion surrounding Doncic.  Dude commonly averages close to 10apg, so you can't turnaround and be like he doesn't get his teammates involved.  But it's just like, well, I don't think there's any team in the NBA - including the Lakers, marketing aside - who would rather have Luka than Brunson at this point.  None of them, except arguably the Knicks, could see this coming.

SHOUTOUT TO THE KNICKS

One of the reasons I'm calling this the Wemby Era, even if the Spurs don't win the championship, is because once dude fleshes out and like puts on more muscle, man, he's going to be an even bigger problem than he is now.  But as it currently stands, Victor's biggest weakness is his lightassednees.  It appears, at times, that the Thunder tried to exploit that, but they don't really have the personnel to do so, especially with Williams hurt

The Knicks, however, have the personnel.  They have the best all-around wing core in the league, and they are clearly physically stronger than the Spurs.  NYK's starting five is so stacked that Mikal Bridges is like the third or fourth option or some shit.

And the way I see it, going back to Brunson vs. Luka but also with Bridges vs. Durant, that's the biggest challenge of being an NBA braintrust, as far as roster decisions are concerned.  You're forced to constantly deal with this dilemma of having to choose between what the fans want, i.e. marketability, versus actually winning.  But of course, we don't have that problem at NBA Inception.  Here, we can tell the truth.

So if you dig back, you'll see that when the Suns traded KD for Bridges, I was like why?  Kevin is and by the looks of things always will be more popular.  But, as I argued back then, Bridges is the better all-around player.

CONCLUSION

In a perfect world, all braintrusts would be incepted, and every team would consequently be a contender(?).  But in the real world, you know, niggas be doing some dumb shit.  Like if the Lakers were going to trade AD - remember, this is a franchise that always had like the best C in the league and won accordingly.  So if you're going to trade AD, why for Luka anyway?  That was a Hollywood-inspired decision.  So anytime a superstar is involved in a transaction the question must be asked - is this decision based more on popularity or competitiveness?  The Rockets going after KD, was that more about popularity or competitiveness?  Could they have made wiser decisions in pursuit of the Larry O'Brien?  And on the flip side of the coin, what about players who are devalued because they aren't popular?

2026 Elimination Ruminations: OKC Thunder

OKC THUNDER (11-4)

In the last post, I sorta implied - or maybe it sounded like I took for granted - that the Thunder would win, but I didn't mean it like that.  What I was saying is that, imo, they would have been a better matchup for the Knicks.  That is to say that if any team in the East has the perimeter defenders (not including KAT or Brunson) to counteract the Spurs, it's NYK.

And you know, I wasn't the only person sounding like OKC was going to win.  Even mainstream outlets were doing the same, to the point that I even heard one YouTuber claim there was some type of rigging conspiracy in their favor.  Well, he was obviously wrong.  "The Dragon" won't be released this year.

JUSTICE IS SERVED

I've been saying for a year now that if Haliburton hadn't tripped over a banana peel in Game 7 of the 2025 Finals, it was very much looking, from the onset, like the Pacers were going to upset the Thunder and furthermore blow them TF out.  In hindsight, OKC's braintrust should have taken that more seriously, i.e. made some type of significant upgrade.

Maybe they were thinking 'oh, Tyrese is hurt. We ain't got nothing to worry about this season'.  You know, they believed their own press type shit.  Indeed, the danger of everybody being on your d*ck is thinking you're better than you actually are.

That's taking nothing away from Jared McCain who for spurts looked like OKC's best player.  The way the Thunder acquired him reinforced just how exceptional their braintrust is.

Also, shoutout to Jalen Williams.  Now we see that yes, despite their depth or regular season dominance, his playability is integral to this team's overall success.  But he's obviously not a true Pippen in terms of durability.

It's also safe to predict that now, all of that SGA MVP shit will stop, not saying that he isn't deserving though.  Some people say that he's boring to watch, but I beg to differ.  Having this relatively-slow PG who you like already know what he's going to do but still can't stop is must-watch, imo.  He's the most-methodical high-scoring PG since John Stockton (though not necessarily comparing the two).  But by the end of the day, he was effectively neutralized by Wemby.  And you know, it ain't like Shai can go to the gym during the offseason and grow a foot taller or some shit.

This is only Wembanyama's third season, but I think it's safe to say he's the best defender I've ever seen.  Lebron, in his prime, could guard the 1 through 5, though you wouldn't want to put him (defensively) against the bigger Cs.  But big or small, Wemby can defend them all.

SHOUTOUT TO THE SPURS

The Spurs are the only team who have more or less been contenders for 30 years straight.  They won at least one championship in the 1990s, 2000s, 2010s and now possibly 2020s.  That's three different roster iterations (though two were led by Duncan).  No other franchise, not even the Lakers, can make that claim.

Picking Wemby a couple of years back was a no-brainer.  So what they should really be applauded for was drafting Castle who, the way I remember it, wasn't particularly popular coming into the league.

I remember when dude won ROY, and pundits were like 'so what. The class is garbage, so who else you gonna choose?'.  I remember they were even talking like, once the Spurs acquired Fox (and later drafted Harper) that they should just trade dude away or some shit.  Man, were they wrong.  When he banged it on SGA - I think that was in Game 4 or 5 - that's when you knew that the MVP was indeed beatable.

Speaking of which, my favorite thing about this series was the physicality.  Dudes played like real men, like now, you could see the difference between the NBA and WNBA(?).  All types of bodies were flying, with Wemby's light ass getting thrown to the floor nightly.  Yet, no punches were thrown, although I think there was like one altercation.

That's the scariest thing about Victor, imo.  His height, coupled with his mobility, is intrinsically an unfair advantage in the game of basketball.  It's more of a natural advantage than Steph having twice the shooting genes of Dell.  You see all types of players now mimicking Curry to success.  But there's no way they can copy Wemby.

But the truly scariest thing, I meant to say, is his competitiveness.  Even with all of his talent and advantages, dude is out there playing dirty and shit, you know, throwing elbows and taking cheap shots, like he really wants to win.  But as he becomes the most-popular player in the NBA, i.e. someone finally surpassing LBJ, the refs need to keep an eye on that type of shit.  You don't want the face of the league earning the reputation of a bad boy, because then, everyone else will follow.

WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?

Despite all that shit I was talking earlier, I don't think OKC's roster need any changes at this point, not with the recent acquisition of McCain and the emergence of Caruso.  In fact, as far as this postseason for instance, it almost seems like they now have more rotation players than they can accommodate, even with the absence of Williams.

Rather, the main priority should be the health of Jalen.  But you know, as I always say with these young injuries, who knows if dude will ever fully recuperate?  The good news is that he already won a championship, as well as made an All-Star Game.  The bad news is that, oh shit, he hasn't even gotten past his rookie contract yet(!).

This iteration of the Thunder have to play it back at least one more season to see if they can get revenge.  But that said, it takes both Holmgren and Hartenstein to attempt to neutralize Wemby.  So if anything, they obviously need another big, one who can come off the bench and actually have an interior impact against the best in the league.    

2026 Elimination Ruminations: Cleveland Cavaliers

CLEVELAND CAVALIERS (8-10)

I was waiting for weeks for the Cavs to get eliminated just to say that, I hope they didn’t promise the Beard a max extension when they acquired him (like Morey reportedly did).  And now that I’ve done the research, oh sh*t, dude has like a $45mil player option(!) for next season.  And there’s no way he’s going to turn that money down, not at this stage in his career.

If this were the NFL, where the risk of serious injury is a lot greater, I’d say that Harden needs to retire already because after his stint with Cleveland, whenever it ends, I don’t think any team is going to really want him again, at least not for any type of star-level money, regardless of how potent he may be offensively.

None of this is meant to be an insult against the Beard.  The Cavs are a good watch, and whether the Knicks win a championship, Haliburton comes back or whatever, with a full season of Harden, I’m totally expecting them to be the number-one seed out of the East next season.  Like this squad is built for the 82-game grind.  They’re the only team I can think of, off the top of my head, that not only have two allstar level PGs (if you consider Mitchell as one), but furthermore, they two have totally different looks.  In other words, the Cavs play different dependent on which one of them is running the show.

SHOUTOUT TO DARIUS GARLAND

But their braintrust made two big roster mistakes this season.  First was trading Darius Garland.  Why?  Because last postseason, when they got embarrassed by the Pacers, the excuse was ‘Garland is injured’.  So if that’s the case, now that he’s back, let’s at least give him another chance to see if he can compete in the playoffs and be ‘healthy’ throughout, you know, if he was the difference between them failing and potentially making it out of the East.

Second, it doesn’t wholly make sense why they traded him for Harden.  Why?  Because going back to that two PG thing, the argument was already that Darius and Spider’s styles overlapped, and that Mitchell, all things considered, should be given the keys to the car.  Instead, they turned around and gave them to the Beard, in a manner of speaking.

NO BEARD, NO CRY

James is a lot better than Donovan at getting all of his teammates involved.  It’s also cool that when Harden is running the show, Mitchell gets a chance to lay back and rest, until he’s really needed to explode.  But like I said, that kinda confusion, if you will, is good for the regular season but not so much for the playoffs - not against one of the handful of teams that's actually deeper and more talented than Cleveland.  The way the Cavs got to the ECF, given their talent and depth, wasn’t too convincing.

Maybe we can say that, with time, they all will mesh better.  Or rather, as optimistic(?) fans(?) we have to say that, because there’s no way the Beard is going to opt out of that payday.  So we’re going to get another season of this if we want it or not, because even though some of the lower-rung teams may be willing to take on Harden and his contract - I'm thinking something like the Blazers for instance - let's not forget he’s diva-ish and isn’t likely to play for a squad that doesn't look like a contender.  That can be a real problem, i.e. an overpaid player demanding to play on a contender - and furthermore, the contender being dumb enough to give him that money.

So by the looks of things, the one who’s going to have to bite the bullet - be scapegoated, if you will - is Jarrett Allen.  He’s made a name for himself as sort of this perennial DPOY type.  But given the way the Pistons ran all roughshod in the paint, against both Allen and Mobley, it's obvious that the former, not to blame it all on Jarrett, but he's lost a step or two.

He’s still good for lobs and putbacks and stuff like that, which is needed playing alongside Mobley, who prefers the perimeter.  But with that in mind, the Cavs could still use an upgrade.  And it doesn’t have to be a C per se but even one of those brolly type wings like Sengun or Anunoby.  But instead, you know, that money is going to the Beard.

LET’S GO KNICKS(?)

Even though I was expecting NYK to fuck up in one way or another instead of reaching the Finals, I also said, way back at the beginning of this season, that the East was theirs to lose, but lose it they didn’t.  So, give props where props are due.  They have the most all-around talented starting five in the league, and sticking together another season, instead of hastily blowing it all up, has paid off.  Also, unlike last year, everyone is ‘healthy’ this postseason, and they’ve also buttressed the bench.

The reason I'm glad they made it, more than anything, is because they’d be the best matchup for the Thunder.  Taking nothing away from the Spurs, but the way OKC’s roster is built, obviously you’re going to need more than a Wemby to beat them in a seven-game series.  And even if San Antonio does win, they’re probably going to be too worn down to really compete with the Knicks.

NYK and OKC are the two deepest, most-talented teams in the league, and thankfully they’re in different conferences, so it’s only right they should meet.  Also, their contest will finally settle the young vs. old debate, in a way.  You don't see young bucks like Jared McCain getting run on the Knicks.

Also, one last shoutout to Halliburton and the Pacers.  Let’s not forget that they were on the verge of totally upsetting the Thunder last season.  Too bad Myles Turner bounced, and they traded away Mathurin like that.  They should’ve at least gave themselves a chance to run it back and see if they could replicate the magic and, whether win it all or lose, go down as a legendary team in history.

CONCLUSION

Maybe in a perfect world, Lebron would return to the Cavs, and the Beard would head out to L.A. to play alongside - or rather let’s say replace - the perennially-injured Luka.

I recently read that whoever wins the WCF will be the favorites over the Knicks.  But check this out - they're bringing in the rowdiest of the rowdy.  I’m not so sure the Spurs can beat the Knicks in a seven-game series.

But as for OKC, even though they aren’t as all-around talented, they are younger, have better balance and greater depth (the latter particularly if everyone is playable).

2026 Elimination Ruminations: Rockets, Sixers

HOUSTON ROCKET (2-4)

Somehow, I totally forgot to write about the Rockets when they got eliminated a week ago.  So I'm sitting here watching Thunder vs. Lakers and wondering how a team as mediocre as LAL made it all the way to the Second Round, how they're absolutely no match for their opponent.  And that's when I remembered the Rockets.

The Lakers, as far as I know, are the luckiest team in NBA history.  They exceeded most peoples' expectations this past season, but once Luka went down, I think everyone knew that was pretty much it. 

But let's say, if I were writing like a movie script for the 2026 NBA Playoffs that I wanted to make money yet also be believable, even if I knew LAL wouldn't make it to the end, I wouldn't want them getting eliminated in the First Round.  In other words, they really got lucky with that Durant injury, that seemingly popped out of nowhere and kept him out the entire round.

I won't go as far as saying that adding Durant but losing Fred "Care Bear" VanVleet (to injury) is one step forward, two steps backward.  But it doesn't make much difference anyway when both of them can't play.  So it's like this postseason's iteration of the Rockets was actually worst than the team they fielded last year with no Kevin, but at least then they had Fred. 

Without doing any actual research, I think it's safe to presume that Durant and VanVleet are the oldest players on the roster.  Dudes like Sengun, Thompson and even Smith Jr. are like from whole 'nother generation as far as the NBA is concerned.  That's something to consider, going into next year, that both of the scorers this team depends on were injured and unable to help the team this postseason, and generally speaking, age doesn't go in reverse.

So yes, I do advocate Houston going out and looking for younger scorers rather than continuing to depend on the elders.  You know, do the age-appropriate thing.  No one wants to see yet another First Round exit.  But since they're already contracted, I doubt if Kevin or Fred are going anywhere.

When making such gambles, putting your championship hopes on an aged Durant for instance, you have to have that dogged, Sixers' mentality of 'if only they're all healthy, then we'll win'.  Oh well.

By the time all is said and done, the Rockets' insistence on fielding these old dudes may result in the younger ones, who actually want to win or when they start demanding more money, bouncing.  I've been advocating for years that a superstar vet like KD needs to go to a young, up-and-coming team instead of always chasing an instant championship, but it wasn't supposed to look like this.  If you look back, I'm sure I even said he should go to the Pistons.  But this is what happens when there's too much reliance on a superstar which these days, even with younger ones is not ideal.

PHILADELPHIA 76ERS (4-7)

The good news is that the Sixers' big 3 was actually healthy for the majority of the postseason.  The bad news is it not really mattering, arguably being a detriment even, when 'healthy', in this context, is a slow Joel Embiid whose defensive presence is, I would argue, even more of a nonfactor than Lebron's has become.

Lebron's defensive decline is attributable to mileage + age.  The cause of Joel's is mileage + injuries.  Age, I would argue, can be counteracted more consistently than injury.

So the first question is, why do the Sixers insist on starting and giving major minutes to a hobbled C?  Part of it, as with James, lies in the fact that Embiid is still one of the best players on the team.

But that said, these failures have been going on for years already.  Dig through the blog if you want.  The signs that Philly needs to move on from Joel have been there for a minute.  It's not like a revelation and shit.

Dude didn't start playing basketball 'til he was 16 yet has made more money, in like just a decade, than most people with jobs they hate make in their entire lives.  Dude got a (questionable) MVP Award and an Olympic gold medal, you know, when he played for a stacked Team USA instead of a disadvantaged African squad.  So what else does he want?

If the answer is a championship, then the Sixers' braintrust, as outstanding as they are at times, needs to do better.  For instance, even though he has his moments, it's still not abundantly clear why they signed Paul George for $50+mil/year(!).

PG13 is an exceptional scorer, but he's no spring chicken either, and there's a lot of younger guys who can more or less score just as well (even if not as entertaining in doing so) and are less expensive.  One name that comes to mind off the top of my head is his former teammate, Normal Powell.

So what I foresee with Philly is sorta the same as Houston, though the latter is in a better position, as the former needs to embark on a mini rebuild.  The Rockets have a core of young players, so all they need to do is make a couple of adjustments.  The Sixers meanwhile, their core for the most part, looking to the future, only inarguably consists of Maxey and Edgecombe, which is a helluva combination.  But now, they need to put the types of players around that can complement such an undersized backcourt.  They need some of those strong, versatile, Knicks-like wings - I'm thinking someone like Scottie Barnes, but I know he isn't available.  And if Draymond is forced to move or whatever, he can probably help them a bit also.

2026 Elimination Ruminations: Celtics, Magic, Raptors

BOSTON CELTICS (3-4)

This was a really odd season in Boston.  The Celtics, without Tatum, were supposed to tank or at least be mediocre but instead, as happens sometimes (reference the 1993 Bulls), retained their championship pedigree even without the face of the franchise.  Then Jayson returned sooner than expected.  In hindsight, even though he regained form quickly, that was mistake number one.  The way dudes were playing, you shoulda let them finish the season out as is.  You see how they almost beat the Sixers, at full strength, in Game 7 without Tatum.

And while we're crying over spilt milk, let it also be known that I'm strong advocate of continuity.  Age factors, salaries, injuries, etc., you don't breakup a proven championship-level team prematurely, just because the star of the show is unable to play or whatever, taking for granted that your braintrust will promptly recuperate.  That's akin to quitting, besides betraying fans, and it's like the whole conclusive lesson of The Last Dance.  I'm not saying that still having Holiday, Porzingis and Horford around would have made a difference. But we'll never know, will we?

You can't tell a team that it's better to just play a season out without a star if he misses important segments and then suddenly at the last second, emerges playable.  Squads like the Sixers and Pistons also took such risks, and for them it paid off.

Embiid, hobbled he may be, emerged as the x-factor against Boston.  So I guess the ultimate lesson in all this, as has been the case for seasons (even when they did recently win a championship), is please Celtics, try to acquire a consistent, playable, above-average big.  Why they decided not to play Vucevic in Game 7, who knows?  And I'm not taking anything away from Queta, who's an overachiever.  But it's time to start taking the paint seriously again.  You can't have like rookies and shit running all roughshod over you during the playoffs.

ORLANDO MAGIC (3-4)

I'm not convinced that the Pistons are the better team.  Deeper, yes.  But what I rather believe is that if Franz Wagner remained playable, the Magic would have took it in five or six.  There really isn't much reason, based on this series, to believe otherwise.

Maxing Wagner out was a controversial decision, one of the main reasons (besides the fact he isn't a superstar) being his unpredictable health.  Health-wise, he's like a typical European in the NBA - an exceptional offensive force, but you wouldn't want to overplay (or overpay) him.

I'm also having a hard time understanding Orlando's fascination with Wendell Carter Jr.  I've been saying for year and years, even back when the Warriors were still formidable and everyone was still on this smallball shit, that the Magic needed to upgrade in the post.

Instead, they went out and acquired Bane.  I'm not going lie - that move panned out a lot better than I expected, if you consider barely making the playoffs and taking the number-one seed to seven games in the First Round an accomplishment.  Now, Orlando is just a couple of moves away for real.  They need to add a big who's actually effective and figure out a way to mitigate offensive deficiencies during those inevitable times when Franz can't play.

And ideally, they won't lose anyone in the process of rectifying those woes, as what ultimately did the Magic in against Detroit, more than anything, was lack of depth.  About midway through Game 6, dudes just ran out of steam and never fully regained it, outside of Banchero and his skinnier, less-talented yet still effective clone, Anthony Black.  Games 6 and 7, you could see Orlando came out hot (as usual).  The Pistons really couldn't do shit about it, but the Magic couldn't maintain the pace.

And by the way, whatever happened to Jonathan Isaac?  Remember that dude, a defensive specialist?  If he wasn't all banged up, the Magic would've won.

TORONTO RAPTORS (3-4)

As usual, despite their winning ways, the Cavs have failed to instill confidence in their fans.  They're one of the top 5, if not top 3, deepest teams in the NBA.  Yet they struggled to best an opponent with two of its starters missing the entire series.

Let's not forget that besides Ingram, who's a reigning All-Star, Quickley also isn't playable.  So instead, we have dudes starting who I never heard of before, like this cat Shead, proving heroes against one of the most-talented rosters in the league.  This series had sort of that Minnesota vs. Denver quality to it.

Right before Game 7, I stumbled across a video arguing that the Beard is 'the worst-performing superstar in NBA history'.  Until watching that clip, I didn't really know it was that bad.  In Game 7, if you look at the box score, he didn't really fare well at all, as the only reason he got near 20 pts was due to freethrows.

I know this isn't supposed to be about Cleveland, but in hindsight, that Harden trade looks sorta like one step forward, two steps backwards.  I won't go as far as to say that Mitchell is better at the point.  Harden is a lot better at getting his teammates involved.  But like his cohort, Donovan needs, indeed deserves the ball in his hand.  And that's the dilemma - having two deserving, ball dominant points (similar to when Garland was around) - on top of James' tendency to fizzle out.

That said, out of all the teams eliminated in the First Round, I would say that Toronto is the one that least needs a major roster change (outside of maybe acquiring a Giannis or something like that).  Their team is set, but damn those injuries, especially when it comes to the likes of Ingram. 

2026 Play-In Elimination Ruminations: Warriors, Clippers, Heat, Hornets

WARRIORS (1-1)

Here's how influential Steph Curry is.  Now that he can no longer consistently win games on some miracle 3-pointer shit, the whole entire rest of the league is shifting back towards the inside game.  When he's on, everyone is encouraged.  And when he's off, they come back down to reality.

This is something I've been predicting for awhile.  The world moves in cycles, and it was only a matter of time before NBAers began realizing the value of attacking the paint again.  However, I thought it would be due to emergence of a dominant big, not the decline of Steph and the rise of SGA.

All Steph appears to need, even at this aged stage of his career, is an all-star level player on the side.  In their first game of the Play-Ins, when they knocked off the Clippers, that player was Porzingis.

Kristaps has also been a recurring subject on this blog over the years.  When he's on, he's undoubtedly on of the best players in the league - a European version of Wembanyama(?), if you will   The thing tho is his health is such that you can't even rely on him for two games in a row.  Remember that when the Celtics won their championship is 2024, he didn't even play in like half of the postseason games.

So if you revisit that loss to the Suns, when Curry was walking off the court afterwards crying, shaking the hands of all of his teammates, you'll notice that he sneered at Porzingis.  It isn't his fault, Steph.  If as a team you find yourself relying on Kristaps's consistently for whatevr reason, then you're doomed.  And Golden State's braintrust has long lost their marbles, even gambling on the health of a late-30s Jimmy Butler.

LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS (0-1)

I hope Kawhi isn't forced to leave or whatever TF is going on out there.  I would argue that the Clippers are a better team than the Warriors but unfortunately caught the latter on a hot night, when Porzingis surprisingly decided to show up.

Sometimes, I don't think Leonard even realizes how good he actually is.  He's an alpha who doesn't even need to be on a superteam.  That last championship he won, he was the undisputed alpha.

I understand that he's another player whose health you can't rely on.  But I think the Clippers should continue to build a team that can without him though without adding someone who would minimize his leadership.

So if the Clippers do retain his services, I'm hoping that Los Angeles doesn't go out looking for another perennial allstar unless maybe Giannis.  But if he does leave, it'll be interesting to see him go to the Nuggets, who look like they're about to embark on some type of rebuild.

MIAMI HEAT (0-1)

I'm just going to go ahead and say it - the Heat could've really used Terry Rozier who, despite not being an allstar, is an above-average scoring point.  I know the temptation must be great, but sometimes when dudes go out doing their thing, wearing x-ray glasses to poker games and shit like that, they need to think about their teams also, like how they'll be affected once you're caught.

You can't just go out and replace a player like Rozier without giving up something in return.  Maybe the NBA will introduce a "Felon's Exception", so that teams whose players are in trouble with the law can get a little bit of extra dough to replace them.

CHARLOTTE HORNETS (1-1)

Entering the postseason, the ROY was Knueppel's to lose, and lose it he did.  Dude just totally disappeared when his team needed him most.

I didn't really see enough of those games to understand why.  Maybe it was the jitters?  Maybe his teammates were so amped up that they ignored him?  Maybe a little bit of both?  I don't know.

Charlotte can be considered one of those teams that's built for perimeter play.  So now you have someone like Banchero - finally being incepted maybe - using his big, strong body attacking the rim instead of playing pansy jumpshot.  Even Franz Wagner was attacking the rim.  And the result?  The Hornets were not equipped to do anything about it.

In any event, taking for granted they'll make the postseason next year, this team needs to focus on keeping Kon involved, even in big games.  Maybe he'll mature enough on his own in the meantime to learn how to make his presence felt.

Finally, the Hornets were able to turn things around and look formidable, after like decades in obscurity, only to win one postseason game due to the opposing squad losing their best player and then getting blown out in the next.  Reason for optimism?  I don't know, but this looks like a team that can finally start focusing on its frontcourt instead of always adding guards. 

The Dilemma of the Unneeded Superstar

I know I talk a lot of shit, but I understand that in reality being an NBA GM type can't be easy - if for no other reason than having to deal with actual human beings are opposed to everything being theoretical or in your head.

For example, it's one thing if I say 'hey, maybe the Pistons are better at this point without Cade Cunningham'.  But it'll be a whole 'nother ballgame for Detroit's braintrust to actually bench him accordingly.  And I can see both the positives and negatives of letting Cade ball.  You can rationalize this decision by arguing that the Pistons will inevitably need him at some point in the playoffs.  But on the downside, the way the team was hot, maybe they would have done better by waiting for that moment rather than instantly forcing him back into the spotlight.

WHAT MAKES A SUPERSTAR?

There's this old saying that in the NBA, a superstar is "a player who makes his teammates better".  I don't know if I necessarily believe that 100%, but let's apply that argument to Cade.

Please forgive me if I don't feel like googling for exact statistics, but in summation, the Pistons started off the season really hot, to the point of Cunningham being in the MVP conversation and the team securing the number1 seed.  Despite playing alongside a fellow allstar in Jalen "Woolridge" Duren, Cade is undoubtedly the face of the franchise.

Then, I think about a month ago, he suffered a "collapsed lung".  Now I don't know exactly what a "collapsed lung" is, but shit sounds life threatening by default.  But lo and behold, not only is he back for the postseason but even the team's very first game.

Now this is why, by that above definition, Cunningham would definitely be a superstar.  The Pistons, under his leaderships, had gotten to the point where they actually playing better without him.  So between October and March, when Cade was healthy, he did in fact make his teammates better, because if you go back like a season or two ago, when dude was hurt niggas was garbage.

And this isn't as much of an anomaly as some people may think.  When Jordan retired the first time, the Bulls would have made it all the way back to the NBA Finals, without him, if not for that bullsh*t call on Hubert Davis.  It was Pippen and them playing in the shadow under Jordan those previous years which got them to that level of greatness.

There was also a time, earlier this season, when the Thunder were virtually unbeatable without Jalen Williams.  Yeah, you really did make your teammates better, mate - so much better that now they can score without you.

SHOUTOUT PAOLO

Readers of this blog can attest to the fact that I've been very critical of Banchero's style of play, like he's DeMar DeRozan, despite being the size of a baby ram.  But now you see your boy finally crashing the paint and reaping the benefits thereof.  He's like a latino Lebron or some shit, like get in his way if you want.

In fact, the league as a whole is starting to re-realize how important the post is, you know, as the easiest place to score from on the entire court.  Lebron also recently had his 'wait a minute' moment, with the Rockets paying the price.  So these teams that are built to defend solely from the perimeter, they're going to have some big problems into the foreseeable future.

In a way, I guess you can say Shai started this trend, but I think it also has a lot to do with the decline of Steph.  Now that his magic is on and off, everyone else is starting to come back to reality.  Talk about influential.

CONCLUSION

The way the Pistons were rolling, even if Cunningham was ready to come back, there was really no need to rush it.  But if they do go on to experience an extended playoff run, I guess the sooner he's back into the mix, the better(?).